(Rightallegiance.com) – President Donald Trump has directed a formal investigation into former President Joe Biden’s use of an autopen—a device that replicates a person’s signature—during his final months in office. The inquiry aims to determine whether Biden’s aides concealed his cognitive decline by using the autopen to sign official documents, potentially without his direct involvement.
The autopen has been utilized by previous presidents, including Biden, to sign routine documents when they are unavailable. However, concerns have arisen regarding the frequency of its use during Biden’s second term, particularly in the context of reports suggesting a decline in his cognitive abilities. A recent book by journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson alleges that Biden’s mental and physical faculties deteriorated during his re-election campaign, leading to questions about the legitimacy of decisions made during that period.
In a memorandum issued on June 4, 2025, President Trump instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House Counsel David Warrington to investigate whether Biden’s aides used the autopen to sign over 1,200 presidential documents, including pardons and executive orders, during a time when Biden’s cognitive state was reportedly in question. The memorandum alleges that this practice may have been an unconstitutional exercise of presidential authority.
Former President Biden has vehemently denied the allegations, asserting that he was fully responsible for all decisions made during his presidency. In a statement, Biden described the investigation as a politically motivated distraction, aimed at diverting attention from legislative proposals that he contends would harm essential programs like Medicaid and benefit the wealthy.
The investigation has significant political ramifications, as it questions the validity of numerous executive actions taken during Biden’s final months in office. If evidence is found that Biden’s aides improperly used the autopen without his knowledge, it could lead to legal challenges against those actions. Additionally, the inquiry may fuel ongoing debates about presidential health and the transparency of executive decision-making processes.
As the investigation unfolds, it will likely continue to be a focal point in discussions about presidential authority, accountability, and the health of public officials. Both supporters and critics of the former administration are closely monitoring the situation, which has the potential to reshape perceptions of executive power and oversight in the United States.
aSxNd KwEzL xvp lgwFYUpw hbawlz DfKLRzMv NYN